The fundamental difference between PNG and JPG is the type of compression: JPG uses lossy compression, discarding part of the data to produce smaller files. PNG uses lossless compression, preserving every pixel exactly as in the original. This distinction determines everything — quality, file size, transparency, and each format's best use case.

Direct comparison

FeaturePNGJPG
Compression typeLosslessLossy
Transparency (alpha channel)✅ Supported❌ Not supported
Ideal for photographs❌ No — large file✅ Yes — very efficient
Ideal for logos and icons✅ Yes — sharp edges❌ No — visible artifacts
Ideal for screenshots with text✅ Yes❌ No — blurry text
File size (photo)3–10× larger than JPGBaseline (1×)
Re-saving with no cumulative loss✅ Yes❌ No — degrades with every save
CompatibilityUniversalUniversal
Animation support❌ Not native❌ No

How each one compresses the image

JPG divides the image into 8×8 pixel blocks and applies the Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) to eliminate high-frequency information the human eye notices less. In photos — with smooth gradients and natural color variation — this discarding is almost imperceptible. On sharp edges and areas of flat color (text, logos, icons), the 8×8 blocks create visible blotches called JPEG artifacts.

PNG uses the DEFLATE algorithm (lossless compression) to reorganize pixel data more efficiently without discarding anything. Every pixel is preserved exactly. For photos, this approach is inefficient — huge files with no visual gain. For images with sharp edges and areas of flat color, the absence of artifacts makes all the difference.

⚠️ Watch out for JPG compression cycles: every time a JPG is opened and saved again, compression is applied on top of already-compressed data. After 5–10 cycles, the degradation becomes visible. Always work from the original file and export to JPG only at the final step.

When to use PNG

When to use JPG

What about WebP?

WebP is the modern format that competes with both: it produces files 25–35% smaller than JPG for photos and 20–30% smaller than PNG for graphics, with transparency support. For web use in 2026, WebP is the more efficient choice in practically every case where JPG or PNG would be used. See the complete comparison in PNG vs WebP and JPG vs WebP.

Convert between PNG and JPG now

Free conversion in your browser, no sign-up, no files sent to external servers.

Convert image for free
Does PNG always have better quality than JPG?
No. For photographs, a JPG saved at 85–90% quality is visually indistinguishable from PNG — and the file can be 5–10 times smaller. PNG has superior quality for logos, icons, and text because its lossless compression preserves sharp edges that JPG distorts.
Can I convert JPG to PNG to improve quality?
No. Converting an already-compressed JPG to PNG doesn't recover the data discarded by compression — the PNG will preserve exactly the JPG's pixels, including the artifacts. To get a quality PNG, you need to start from the original image before any compression.
Why did my logo get blotchy edges after saving as JPG?
Because JPG's 8×8 block algorithm creates blotches (artifacts) around sharp edges and areas of flat color — exactly what makes up most logos. For logos, always use PNG (with a transparent background) or SVG.